<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 400 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHANDIGARH BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398281</link>
    <description>The Tribunal disposed of the case in favor of CLE Private Limited, allowing their alternative relief request to sanction the Scheme excluding the transfer of Anant Raj Limited&#039;s shareholding in Roseland Buildtech Private Limited and the related Note 2. The Tribunal found that this resolution addressed CLE&#039;s objections and did not delve into the other contentions raised by the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:55:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 400 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHANDIGARH BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398281</link>
      <description>The Tribunal disposed of the case in favor of CLE Private Limited, allowing their alternative relief request to sanction the Scheme excluding the transfer of Anant Raj Limited&#039;s shareholding in Roseland Buildtech Private Limited and the related Note 2. The Tribunal found that this resolution addressed CLE&#039;s objections and did not delve into the other contentions raised by the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>