<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 399 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398280</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under Section 9 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code (IBC) as the default of instalments under the Settlement Agreement did not meet the definition of operational debt. The Tribunal found that the claim based on the Settlement Agreement dated 15.06.2018 was not enforceable as operational debt, leading to the dismissal of the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 399 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398280</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under Section 9 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code (IBC) as the default of instalments under the Settlement Agreement did not meet the definition of operational debt. The Tribunal found that the claim based on the Settlement Agreement dated 15.06.2018 was not enforceable as operational debt, leading to the dismissal of the application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>