<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 397 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398278</link>
    <description>Credible official witnesses can sustain an NDPS conviction even when independent witnesses turn hostile, and their evidence need not be discarded merely for that reason. The Court also held that compliance with the statutory search, seizure, sealing, custody and sample-forwarding requirements was proved, and treated the sample-number discrepancy as a clerical error. It further found that the FIR-recording officer did not in fact continue as investigator, so the proceedings were not vitiated on that ground. Ownership of the vehicle was held immaterial where possession and recovery of contraband from the accused were proved, and no basis was found to reduce the sentence. The conviction and sentence were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:51:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 397 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398278</link>
      <description>Credible official witnesses can sustain an NDPS conviction even when independent witnesses turn hostile, and their evidence need not be discarded merely for that reason. The Court also held that compliance with the statutory search, seizure, sealing, custody and sample-forwarding requirements was proved, and treated the sample-number discrepancy as a clerical error. It further found that the FIR-recording officer did not in fact continue as investigator, so the proceedings were not vitiated on that ground. Ownership of the vehicle was held immaterial where possession and recovery of contraband from the accused were proved, and no basis was found to reduce the sentence. The conviction and sentence were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>