https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398277 In a customs prosecution involving recovery of gold, the bail plea was rejected because the court treated the alleged offence as non-bailable under the statutory scheme and relied on the material collected by customs authorities. The absence of supporting documents, the statement recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962, and the cited precedent were considered sufficient to support the prosecution case at the bail stage. On the facts and overall circumstances, no ground was made out to enlarge the applicant on bail, and custody was maintained. en-us Tue, 08 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398277 In a customs prosecution involving recovery of gold, the bail plea was rejected because the court treated the alleged offence as non-bailable under the statutory scheme and relied on the material collected by customs authorities. The absence of supporting documents, the statement recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962, and the cited precedent were considered sufficient to support the prosecution case at the bail stage. On the facts and overall circumstances, no ground was made out to enlarge the applicant on bail, and custody was maintained. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 08 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398277