<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 392 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398273</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court directed the first respondent to either issue an attachment order within 30 days or allow the petitioner to operate the bank account in question. The court emphasized the need for a formal order freezing the account and criticized the respondent for preventing the petitioner from accessing it without proper legal basis. The judgment aimed to provide clarity and ensure adherence to legal procedures regarding the bank account, without expressing any opinion on the ongoing investigation under FEMA.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2020 20:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 392 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398273</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court directed the first respondent to either issue an attachment order within 30 days or allow the petitioner to operate the bank account in question. The court emphasized the need for a formal order freezing the account and criticized the respondent for preventing the petitioner from accessing it without proper legal basis. The judgment aimed to provide clarity and ensure adherence to legal procedures regarding the bank account, without expressing any opinion on the ongoing investigation under FEMA.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>