https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398271 Delay in challenging a summoning order under Section 482 CrPC was not condoned where the applicant offered no satisfactory explanation for filing the application about three years late. The complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act was held to be within limitation because the cheque was presented and dishonoured, notice was served, and the complaint was filed within one month of the cause of action arising on failure to pay within fifteen days of notice. At the stage of process, the Magistrate is concerned only with whether sufficient ground exists to proceed; disputed facts and evidence are matters for trial, so the prima facie case was sustained. en-us Fri, 28 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:50:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398271 Delay in challenging a summoning order under Section 482 CrPC was not condoned where the applicant offered no satisfactory explanation for filing the application about three years late. The complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act was held to be within limitation because the cheque was presented and dishonoured, notice was served, and the complaint was filed within one month of the cause of action arising on failure to pay within fifteen days of notice. At the stage of process, the Magistrate is concerned only with whether sufficient ground exists to proceed; disputed facts and evidence are matters for trial, so the prima facie case was sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398271