<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SEZ Unit Wins Service Tax Refund Case; No Need for Payment to Provider per Rule 7 of Taxation Rules.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54712</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax - SEZ unit - Admittedly, appellant have paid the service tax under reverse charge and produced the challan, and further they have rightly discharged the service tax as recipient of service in terms of 2nd proviso to Rule 7 of the Point of Taxation Rules. Further, there is no such essential condition of payment of amount to the service provider - Refund allowed - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:50:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:50:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>SEZ Unit Wins Service Tax Refund Case; No Need for Payment to Provider per Rule 7 of Taxation Rules.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54712</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax - SEZ unit - Admittedly, appellant have paid the service tax under reverse charge and produced the challan, and further they have rightly discharged the service tax as recipient of service in terms of 2nd proviso to Rule 7 of the Point of Taxation Rules. Further, there is no such essential condition of payment of amount to the service provider - Refund allowed - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:50:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>