<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (7) TMI 89 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23198</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging notices issued under reassessment and assessment provisions was dismissed because the Court declined to interfere where an appellate remedy was available and the petitioner had approached the Court after unexplained delay. The ruling reflects judicial restraint in writ jurisdiction when an alternative statutory remedy exists, especially where delay is not satisfactorily explained. No further merits were examined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:23:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (7) TMI 89 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23198</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging notices issued under reassessment and assessment provisions was dismissed because the Court declined to interfere where an appellate remedy was available and the petitioner had approached the Court after unexplained delay. The ruling reflects judicial restraint in writ jurisdiction when an alternative statutory remedy exists, especially where delay is not satisfactorily explained. No further merits were examined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>