<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 379 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH,</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398260</link>
    <description>The proposed scheme of amalgamation by merger by absorption under the Companies Act, 2013 was sanctioned after the Tribunal found that the requisite corporate approvals had been obtained and no objections were pressed. The Regional Director&#039;s concerns were addressed through undertakings covering compliance with accounting standards, disclosure of the appointed date, service of notices to affected authorities, statutory requirements on share capital and name change, and filing with the RBI where necessary. Relying also on the Official Liquidator&#039;s report that the transferor company&#039;s affairs had been properly conducted, the Tribunal found the scheme fair, reasonable, lawful, and not contrary to public policy or public interest. The appointed date was accepted as 1 April 2019 and the transferor company was ordered dissolved without winding up.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 22:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 379 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH,</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398260</link>
      <description>The proposed scheme of amalgamation by merger by absorption under the Companies Act, 2013 was sanctioned after the Tribunal found that the requisite corporate approvals had been obtained and no objections were pressed. The Regional Director&#039;s concerns were addressed through undertakings covering compliance with accounting standards, disclosure of the appointed date, service of notices to affected authorities, statutory requirements on share capital and name change, and filing with the RBI where necessary. Relying also on the Official Liquidator&#039;s report that the transferor company&#039;s affairs had been properly conducted, the Tribunal found the scheme fair, reasonable, lawful, and not contrary to public policy or public interest. The appointed date was accepted as 1 April 2019 and the transferor company was ordered dissolved without winding up.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>