<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 375 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398256</link>
    <description>The Financial Creditor&#039;s appeal against the rejection of its application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was dismissed by the tribunal. Disputes arose over loan amounts provided to the Corporate Debtor, with allegations of fabricated documents and disputes between Managing Directors. Despite objections, the tribunal emphasized the need for prima facie evidence and found the Financial Creditor failed to establish an admitted and enforceable debt. The tribunal refrained from delving into disputes referred to arbitration, allowing parties to pursue claims in other forums. The dismissal highlighted the limited scope of proceedings under the Code and the importance of substantiated debt claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:50:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 375 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398256</link>
      <description>The Financial Creditor&#039;s appeal against the rejection of its application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was dismissed by the tribunal. Disputes arose over loan amounts provided to the Corporate Debtor, with allegations of fabricated documents and disputes between Managing Directors. Despite objections, the tribunal emphasized the need for prima facie evidence and found the Financial Creditor failed to establish an admitted and enforceable debt. The tribunal refrained from delving into disputes referred to arbitration, allowing parties to pursue claims in other forums. The dismissal highlighted the limited scope of proceedings under the Code and the importance of substantiated debt claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>