<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1810 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290145</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s Miscellaneous Application seeking rectification in the Tribunal order for Assessment Year 2012-13 regarding Transfer Pricing adjustments on loans given to the AE. The Tribunal upheld the principle that income from international transactions must adhere to the arm&#039;s length principle, rejecting the arguments presented by the assessee&#039;s Authorized Representative. The Tribunal remitted the quantification of the applicable rate back to the Assessing Officer/Transfer Pricing Officer for further consideration based on additional evidence submitted by the assessee. The miscellaneous application was dismissed except for the indicated rectification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:05:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1810 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290145</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s Miscellaneous Application seeking rectification in the Tribunal order for Assessment Year 2012-13 regarding Transfer Pricing adjustments on loans given to the AE. The Tribunal upheld the principle that income from international transactions must adhere to the arm&#039;s length principle, rejecting the arguments presented by the assessee&#039;s Authorized Representative. The Tribunal remitted the quantification of the applicable rate back to the Assessing Officer/Transfer Pricing Officer for further consideration based on additional evidence submitted by the assessee. The miscellaneous application was dismissed except for the indicated rectification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>