<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2018 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290147</link>
    <description>The HC held that criminal proceedings under the NDPS Act could not continue where the alleged material was not a notified psychotropic substance on the date of the offence. Catha Edulis was brought within the notified list only by a later notification, while the alleged conduct predated that notification. As the statutory coverage did not exist at the relevant time, the prosecution was unsustainable and the proceedings were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:05:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2018 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290147</link>
      <description>The HC held that criminal proceedings under the NDPS Act could not continue where the alleged material was not a notified psychotropic substance on the date of the offence. Catha Edulis was brought within the notified list only by a later notification, while the alleged conduct predated that notification. As the statutory coverage did not exist at the relevant time, the prosecution was unsustainable and the proceedings were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>