<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1298 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290148</link>
    <description>The court denied the bail application under Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962, concerning the possession of smuggled gold bars. The decision was based on the applicant&#039;s involvement in the offense, as indicated by the evidence presented. The court emphasized that the denial of bail did not prejudge the case&#039;s final outcome but was solely related to the bail application&#039;s disposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 21:05:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1298 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290148</link>
      <description>The court denied the bail application under Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962, concerning the possession of smuggled gold bars. The decision was based on the applicant&#039;s involvement in the offense, as indicated by the evidence presented. The court emphasized that the denial of bail did not prejudge the case&#039;s final outcome but was solely related to the bail application&#039;s disposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>