<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 708 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290140</link>
    <description>A refusal to receive and process a sale document for registration could not be sustained where the only was a notification issued under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908 that had already been declared ultra vires and struck down. With that restraint losing legal force, the registration authority was bound to receive the document and examine it under the Indian Stamp Act and the Registration Act. The document had therefore to be processed in accordance with law, without reliance on the invalid notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 16:26:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 708 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290140</link>
      <description>A refusal to receive and process a sale document for registration could not be sustained where the only was a notification issued under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908 that had already been declared ultra vires and struck down. With that restraint losing legal force, the registration authority was bound to receive the document and examine it under the Indian Stamp Act and the Registration Act. The document had therefore to be processed in accordance with law, without reliance on the invalid notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>