https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290134 Security for costs under Order 25 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure is a specific statutory remedy, so inherent powers under Section 151 should not ordinarily be used to enlarge that jurisdiction. A mere preliminary view that a suit is not bona fide, without trial or established proof, is insufficient to compel plaintiffs to furnish security for costs. The Court noted that false or vexatious claims may be addressed through other remedies, including compensatory costs, and that security for costs remains an exceptional order requiring established grounds. On these principles, the direction to furnish security for costs was held unsustainable and set aside. en-us Fri, 17 Mar 1950 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:13:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290134 Security for costs under Order 25 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure is a specific statutory remedy, so inherent powers under Section 151 should not ordinarily be used to enlarge that jurisdiction. A mere preliminary view that a suit is not bona fide, without trial or established proof, is insufficient to compel plaintiffs to furnish security for costs. The Court noted that false or vexatious claims may be addressed through other remedies, including compensatory costs, and that security for costs remains an exceptional order requiring established grounds. On these principles, the direction to furnish security for costs was held unsustainable and set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 17 Mar 1950 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290134