<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 356 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398237</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling it not maintainable as per legal criteria and lacking merit. The petitioner failed to comply with service tax provisions, did not meet exemption conditions, and was negligent in challenging the order. The court upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision on service tax demand, interest, and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:23:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 356 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398237</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, ruling it not maintainable as per legal criteria and lacking merit. The petitioner failed to comply with service tax provisions, did not meet exemption conditions, and was negligent in challenging the order. The court upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision on service tax demand, interest, and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>