https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398230 Alleged procedural irregularities in NDPS investigation and search did not, by themselves, create an automatic right to bail; the Court treated compliance issues as matters for trial, particularly where evidence had begun and key witnesses remained to be examined. Section 37 was held inapplicable because the charge was framed only under Sections 22(b) and 25, not under Sections 19, 24 or 27A, and the case did not involve commercial quantity. The bail application was therefore considered under the ordinary CrPC framework, and bail was granted on conditions without affecting the merits of the trial. en-us Fri, 04 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:14:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398230 Alleged procedural irregularities in NDPS investigation and search did not, by themselves, create an automatic right to bail; the Court treated compliance issues as matters for trial, particularly where evidence had begun and key witnesses remained to be examined. Section 37 was held inapplicable because the charge was framed only under Sections 22(b) and 25, not under Sections 19, 24 or 27A, and the case did not involve commercial quantity. The bail application was therefore considered under the ordinary CrPC framework, and bail was granted on conditions without affecting the merits of the trial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398230