https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398230 The court granted bail to the accused under the NDPS Act, ruling that the stringent conditions of Section 37 did not apply. The accused was directed to follow the provisions of Chapter XXXIII of the CrPC for bail. The court highlighted the lack of contraband seizure from the accused and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on trial proceedings. Bail was set at Rs. 2,00,000 with specific conditions, including staying within the court's jurisdiction, attending all trial dates, and not tampering with evidence. The court emphasized that the bail decision did not reflect the case's merits for the trial's conclusion. en-us Fri, 04 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:14:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398230 The court granted bail to the accused under the NDPS Act, ruling that the stringent conditions of Section 37 did not apply. The accused was directed to follow the provisions of Chapter XXXIII of the CrPC for bail. The court highlighted the lack of contraband seizure from the accused and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on trial proceedings. Bail was set at Rs. 2,00,000 with specific conditions, including staying within the court's jurisdiction, attending all trial dates, and not tampering with evidence. The court emphasized that the bail decision did not reflect the case's merits for the trial's conclusion. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398230