<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 347 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398228</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order confirming tax assessment and levy but deleting the penalty. The Court found no justification to interfere due to the delay in filing the petition. The challenge to the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision restoring the penalty was deemed insufficient grounds for interference. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed, and related petitions were closed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 18:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 347 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398228</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order confirming tax assessment and levy but deleting the penalty. The Court found no justification to interfere due to the delay in filing the petition. The challenge to the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision restoring the penalty was deemed insufficient grounds for interference. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed, and related petitions were closed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>