<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 342 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398223</link>
    <description>The appeals of the assessee were allowed as the tribunal upheld the bifurcation of income into property and services, allowing business expenses accordingly. The reassessment proceedings were deemed justified under section 147 due to incorrect income representation. The tribunal emphasized the assessee&#039;s right to structure business arrangements beneficially within legal limits, leading to the deletion of the penalty imposed based on disallowed expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:14:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 342 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398223</link>
      <description>The appeals of the assessee were allowed as the tribunal upheld the bifurcation of income into property and services, allowing business expenses accordingly. The reassessment proceedings were deemed justified under section 147 due to incorrect income representation. The tribunal emphasized the assessee&#039;s right to structure business arrangements beneficially within legal limits, leading to the deletion of the penalty imposed based on disallowed expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>