<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1978 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290116</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant company in a service tax dispute related to renting of immovable property. The demand for Service Tax was deemed unsustainable due to legal uncertainties, including the constitutional validity of the tax during the relevant period, and the lack of evidence proving intent to evade payment. The Tribunal emphasized that the mere contravention of the law was not enough to invoke the extended period of limitation, ultimately leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 18:07:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1978 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290116</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant company in a service tax dispute related to renting of immovable property. The demand for Service Tax was deemed unsustainable due to legal uncertainties, including the constitutional validity of the tax during the relevant period, and the lack of evidence proving intent to evade payment. The Tribunal emphasized that the mere contravention of the law was not enough to invoke the extended period of limitation, ultimately leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>