<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1678 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290121</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of Rohit Singh (ITANo.422/Ind/2019), quashing the CPC order and deleting the fee. Appeals in ITANo.930 to 932/Ind/2018 (Anand Township Indore P. Ltd.) were dismissed. The remaining seven appeals were partly allowed, with directions to delete fees for periods before June 1, 2015, and confirm fees for defaults from June 1, 2015, onwards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 18:07:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1678 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290121</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of Rohit Singh (ITANo.422/Ind/2019), quashing the CPC order and deleting the fee. Appeals in ITANo.930 to 932/Ind/2018 (Anand Township Indore P. Ltd.) were dismissed. The remaining seven appeals were partly allowed, with directions to delete fees for periods before June 1, 2015, and confirm fees for defaults from June 1, 2015, onwards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>