<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1808 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290123</link>
    <description>The court closed the writ petition challenging the freezing of the bank account after the petitioner agreed to cooperate with the investigation. The court recorded the submissions of both parties, finding that the account was not frozen but only had restrictions on debit transactions. No costs were awarded, and the related miscellaneous petition was also closed following this decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 18:07:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1808 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290123</link>
      <description>The court closed the writ petition challenging the freezing of the bank account after the petitioner agreed to cooperate with the investigation. The court recorded the submissions of both parties, finding that the account was not frozen but only had restrictions on debit transactions. No costs were awarded, and the related miscellaneous petition was also closed following this decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>