<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 682 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290112</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court clarified that the eligibility criterion for LPG dealership required actual residence in Kangra, rejecting the interpretation of &quot;resident&quot; to include temporary connections. The case was remanded to the High Court for reconsideration based on the Supreme Court&#039;s definition of &quot;resident.&quot; The appeals were concluded without costs being awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 16:14:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 682 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290112</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court clarified that the eligibility criterion for LPG dealership required actual residence in Kangra, rejecting the interpretation of &quot;resident&quot; to include temporary connections. The case was remanded to the High Court for reconsideration based on the Supreme Court&#039;s definition of &quot;resident.&quot; The appeals were concluded without costs being awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>