https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290109 The Board affirmed the judgment in favor of the plaintiff despite irregularities in jury formation, finding no proven prejudice. Allegations of bias and improper communication with jurors were dismissed for lack of credible evidence. The issue of excessive damages was pending. The appellants' petition to set aside the judgment was dismissed for procedural reasons. The use of an outdated jury list did not invalidate the trial. The Board held that the appellants failed to show prejudice from irregularities and dismissed the appeal, upholding the costs orders. en-us Tue, 23 Jan 1917 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Sep 2020 14:42:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290109 The Board affirmed the judgment in favor of the plaintiff despite irregularities in jury formation, finding no proven prejudice. Allegations of bias and improper communication with jurors were dismissed for lack of credible evidence. The issue of excessive damages was pending. The appellants' petition to set aside the judgment was dismissed for procedural reasons. The use of an outdated jury list did not invalidate the trial. The Board held that the appellants failed to show prejudice from irregularities and dismissed the appeal, upholding the costs orders. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Jan 1917 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290109