https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290109 Irregularities in the annual revision and constitution of jury lists do not automatically nullify a trial where no actual prejudice is shown; defects in administrative jury machinery must be distinguished from irregularities that create real prejudice or a risk of packing. The objected juror's alleged relationship was too remote to disqualify him, and the claim of improper communications with the jury was not proved. The challenge to the juror therefore failed, and there was no sufficient ground to set aside the verdict or disturb the judgment. en-us Tue, 23 Jan 1917 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Sep 2020 14:42:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290109 Irregularities in the annual revision and constitution of jury lists do not automatically nullify a trial where no actual prejudice is shown; defects in administrative jury machinery must be distinguished from irregularities that create real prejudice or a risk of packing. The objected juror's alleged relationship was too remote to disqualify him, and the claim of improper communications with the jury was not proved. The challenge to the juror therefore failed, and there was no sufficient ground to set aside the verdict or disturb the judgment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Jan 1917 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290109