<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 323 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398204</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the maturity amount received from the Keyman Insurance Policy was not exempt under section 10(10D) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal determined that the amount should be taxed under the head &quot;income from other sources&quot; rather than as capital gains, based on the specific provisions of the Act. The appeal was dismissed in favor of taxing the maturity amount as income from other sources.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 10:52:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 323 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398204</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the maturity amount received from the Keyman Insurance Policy was not exempt under section 10(10D) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal determined that the amount should be taxed under the head &quot;income from other sources&quot; rather than as capital gains, based on the specific provisions of the Act. The appeal was dismissed in favor of taxing the maturity amount as income from other sources.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>