<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 312 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398193</link>
    <description>The court upheld the reclassification of goods under CTH93039000, settling the issue. It granted the petitioner the chance to reapply for a &#039;Demurrage cum Detention Waiver Certificate&#039; (DDWC), emphasizing the validity of the original request and directing authorities to consider it within twelve weeks. The judgment ensured fair consideration of classification and DDWC matters, aligning with regulations and court precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2020 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 312 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398193</link>
      <description>The court upheld the reclassification of goods under CTH93039000, settling the issue. It granted the petitioner the chance to reapply for a &#039;Demurrage cum Detention Waiver Certificate&#039; (DDWC), emphasizing the validity of the original request and directing authorities to consider it within twelve weeks. The judgment ensured fair consideration of classification and DDWC matters, aligning with regulations and court precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>