https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398190 The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the penalty imposed on a Customs House Agent under Sections 114 and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal found no evidence of acts or omissions leading to goods' confiscation or the knowing use of false documents, thereby setting aside the penalty. The decision favored the appellant due to lack of evidence supporting the allegations and the appellant's compliance with procedures, ruling in their favor on 02.09.2020. en-us Wed, 02 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Sep 2020 20:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398190 The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the penalty imposed on a Customs House Agent under Sections 114 and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal found no evidence of acts or omissions leading to goods' confiscation or the knowing use of false documents, thereby setting aside the penalty. The decision favored the appellant due to lack of evidence supporting the allegations and the appellant's compliance with procedures, ruling in their favor on 02.09.2020. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 02 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398190