<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 305 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398186</link>
    <description>The appeals in this case arising from a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process resulted in the dismissal of the appeals challenging the liquidation order. The Adjudicating Authority approved the liquidation due to the absence of a viable resolution plan and concrete settlement proposals, emphasizing the importance of the Committee of Creditors&#039; commercial wisdom in such decisions. The judgment highlighted the Committee&#039;s authority to decide on liquidation and the possibility for the Promoter/Ex-Director to submit a revival scheme under the Companies Act, even post-liquidation. The appeals were dismissed for lack of merit, affirming adherence to legal provisions in insolvency proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 10:18:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 305 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398186</link>
      <description>The appeals in this case arising from a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process resulted in the dismissal of the appeals challenging the liquidation order. The Adjudicating Authority approved the liquidation due to the absence of a viable resolution plan and concrete settlement proposals, emphasizing the importance of the Committee of Creditors&#039; commercial wisdom in such decisions. The judgment highlighted the Committee&#039;s authority to decide on liquidation and the possibility for the Promoter/Ex-Director to submit a revival scheme under the Companies Act, even post-liquidation. The appeals were dismissed for lack of merit, affirming adherence to legal provisions in insolvency proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>