https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398178 The accused's arguments regarding lack of opportunity for cross-examination, absence of a creditor-debtor relationship, and invalid service of notice demanding payment were dismissed by the Court. The Court upheld the Trial Court's judgment, finding the accused guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The sentence imposed was considered appropriate, and the revision petition was dismissed. The Court praised the amicus curiae's service and recommended an honorarium for each, with the Order to be promptly transmitted to the relevant Courts. en-us Wed, 02 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Sep 2020 10:17:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398178 The accused's arguments regarding lack of opportunity for cross-examination, absence of a creditor-debtor relationship, and invalid service of notice demanding payment were dismissed by the Court. The Court upheld the Trial Court's judgment, finding the accused guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The sentence imposed was considered appropriate, and the revision petition was dismissed. The Court praised the amicus curiae's service and recommended an honorarium for each, with the Order to be promptly transmitted to the relevant Courts. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 02 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398178