https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290092 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order disallowing Cenvat Credit, allowing the appellant's appeal. It concluded that structural items used in fabricating support structures qualified as 'Capital Goods' under Rule 2(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The decision was supported by consistent interpretations from various High Courts, affirming the appellant's entitlement to Cenvat Credit on these items. en-us Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Nov 2024 11:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290092 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order disallowing Cenvat Credit, allowing the appellant's appeal. It concluded that structural items used in fabricating support structures qualified as 'Capital Goods' under Rule 2(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The decision was supported by consistent interpretations from various High Courts, affirming the appellant's entitlement to Cenvat Credit on these items. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290092