<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1324 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290099</link>
    <description>The ITAT Cuttack allowed three appeals related to the levy of late fee under section 234E of the Income Tax Act for AY 2013-14. The tribunal held that the Assessing Officer lacked the power to impose late fees under section 234E before the amendment by the Finance Act, 2015. Relying on precedent, the tribunal set aside the imposition of late fees under section 200A read with 234E of the Act, ruling in favor of the assessee on 4th December 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2020 19:30:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1324 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290099</link>
      <description>The ITAT Cuttack allowed three appeals related to the levy of late fee under section 234E of the Income Tax Act for AY 2013-14. The tribunal held that the Assessing Officer lacked the power to impose late fees under section 234E before the amendment by the Finance Act, 2015. Relying on precedent, the tribunal set aside the imposition of late fees under section 200A read with 234E of the Act, ruling in favor of the assessee on 4th December 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>