<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 710 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290102</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling that demands for penalty/fee under section 234E for the assessment years 2013-14 to 2015-16, made before 01-06-2015, were unsustainable. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of legal authority for such demands pre-amendment. Additionally, the Tribunal validated the appeals as the Revenue failed to provide evidence of service of the order under section 200A, leading to a decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2020 19:30:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 710 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290102</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling that demands for penalty/fee under section 234E for the assessment years 2013-14 to 2015-16, made before 01-06-2015, were unsustainable. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of legal authority for such demands pre-amendment. Additionally, the Tribunal validated the appeals as the Revenue failed to provide evidence of service of the order under section 200A, leading to a decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>