<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (6) TMI 17 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23175</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that &quot;regular assessment&quot; under Section 214 of the Income-tax Act includes the final assessment made by the Income-tax Officer after considering appellate or revisional orders. Interest on excess advance tax paid is payable up to the date of the final assessment order, preventing injustice to the assessee based on initial assessments. The court aligned its interpretation with legislative intent and precedent, upholding the trial judge&#039;s decision without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:24:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (6) TMI 17 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23175</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that &quot;regular assessment&quot; under Section 214 of the Income-tax Act includes the final assessment made by the Income-tax Officer after considering appellate or revisional orders. Interest on excess advance tax paid is payable up to the date of the final assessment order, preventing injustice to the assessee based on initial assessments. The court aligned its interpretation with legislative intent and precedent, upholding the trial judge&#039;s decision without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>