<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 294 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398175</link>
    <description>The court held that the petitioner, a SEZ unit, is entitled to a refund of unutilized IGST credit as there is no specific supplier who can claim the refund under the CGST Act and Rules. The court directed the respondents to process the refund claim within three months, quashed the impugned order, and allowed the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 294 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398175</link>
      <description>The court held that the petitioner, a SEZ unit, is entitled to a refund of unutilized IGST credit as there is no specific supplier who can claim the refund under the CGST Act and Rules. The court directed the respondents to process the refund claim within three months, quashed the impugned order, and allowed the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>