<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 285 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398166</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the late filing fee under Section 234E for TDS statements filed before 01.06.2015 could not be charged, as the amendment to Section 200A(1)(c) was prospective from that date. Due to conflicting High Court decisions, the Tribunal favored the assessee, following the rule of consistency. The Tribunal found the levy of late fees under Section 234E before 01.06.2015 unjustified and directed the deletion of the fee, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2020 10:36:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 285 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398166</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the late filing fee under Section 234E for TDS statements filed before 01.06.2015 could not be charged, as the amendment to Section 200A(1)(c) was prospective from that date. Due to conflicting High Court decisions, the Tribunal favored the assessee, following the rule of consistency. The Tribunal found the levy of late fees under Section 234E before 01.06.2015 unjustified and directed the deletion of the fee, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>