<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 279 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398160</link>
    <description>Assessment framed in the name of an amalgamating company that had already ceased to exist was treated as without jurisdiction where the revenue was informed of the amalgamation during the proceedings. The draft and final assessment orders were nonetheless issued in the non-existent entity&#039;s name, and the tribunal applied the settled principle that an assessment on a non-existent person is void. The assessment was therefore held void ab initio and quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 279 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398160</link>
      <description>Assessment framed in the name of an amalgamating company that had already ceased to exist was treated as without jurisdiction where the revenue was informed of the amalgamation during the proceedings. The draft and final assessment orders were nonetheless issued in the non-existent entity&#039;s name, and the tribunal applied the settled principle that an assessment on a non-existent person is void. The assessment was therefore held void ab initio and quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>