<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 273 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398154</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled that the PCIT wrongly exercised revision jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The AO had made adequate inquiries, and the PCIT did not provide sufficient reasons to deem the AO&#039;s order erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. The Tribunal quashed the PCIT&#039;s order and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2020 10:30:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 273 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398154</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled that the PCIT wrongly exercised revision jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The AO had made adequate inquiries, and the PCIT did not provide sufficient reasons to deem the AO&#039;s order erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. The Tribunal quashed the PCIT&#039;s order and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>