<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 266 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398147</link>
    <description>The Court admitted the winding-up petition, rejecting the respondent&#039;s objections on jurisdiction, restructuring validity, and bona-fide debt dispute. The petitioner was found to have the necessary locus standi and authorization to file the petition. The respondent was prohibited from dealing with its assets, and publication of citations was ordered in designated newspapers, with the case scheduled for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2020 10:30:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 266 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398147</link>
      <description>The Court admitted the winding-up petition, rejecting the respondent&#039;s objections on jurisdiction, restructuring validity, and bona-fide debt dispute. The petitioner was found to have the necessary locus standi and authorization to file the petition. The respondent was prohibited from dealing with its assets, and publication of citations was ordered in designated newspapers, with the case scheduled for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>