<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1583 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290066</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai held that, where the assessee&#039;s books of account were accepted, income had to be computed on that basis and rejection of book results could not be sustained. Additions made by the net accretion method, including those linked to assets and shareholdings, were deleted once the books governed the computation. Third-party material collected behind the assessee&#039;s back could not be relied on without effective opportunity of rebuttal, so the alleged undisclosed investments required reconsideration with opportunity to the assessee and, if needed, remand proceedings. Interest expenditure, other expenses, and connected disallowances were consequential to the book-based computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2020 19:31:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1583 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290066</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai held that, where the assessee&#039;s books of account were accepted, income had to be computed on that basis and rejection of book results could not be sustained. Additions made by the net accretion method, including those linked to assets and shareholdings, were deleted once the books governed the computation. Third-party material collected behind the assessee&#039;s back could not be relied on without effective opportunity of rebuttal, so the alleged undisclosed investments required reconsideration with opportunity to the assessee and, if needed, remand proceedings. Interest expenditure, other expenses, and connected disallowances were consequential to the book-based computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>