<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 26 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23168</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner in condoning the delay in filing appeals by the assessee, citing valid reasons related to the nature of the expenditure in question. The judges agreed that the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s exercise of discretion was appropriate, leading to a favorable outcome for the assessee without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:58:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 26 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23168</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner in condoning the delay in filing appeals by the assessee, citing valid reasons related to the nature of the expenditure in question. The judges agreed that the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s exercise of discretion was appropriate, leading to a favorable outcome for the assessee without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>