<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1393 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290077</link>
    <description>Where service tax and interest are voluntarily paid before issuance of the show cause notice, continuation of proceedings under Section 73 to impose penalty is not justified because the statutory purpose of recovery has already been met. The liability to tax was not disputed, and the prior deposit satisfied the revenue claim. The demand and interest were maintained, but the penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2020 19:31:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1393 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290077</link>
      <description>Where service tax and interest are voluntarily paid before issuance of the show cause notice, continuation of proceedings under Section 73 to impose penalty is not justified because the statutory purpose of recovery has already been met. The liability to tax was not disputed, and the prior deposit satisfied the revenue claim. The demand and interest were maintained, but the penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>