<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 252 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398133</link>
    <description>The Advance Ruling Authority did not provide a ruling on whether GST is payable under Reverse Charge Mechanism for the salary paid to Directors as per their employment contract. The applicant withdrew the application before a decision was made, and the Authority accepted the withdrawal request, concluding the proceedings without issuing any findings or analysis on the GST liability issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 18:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 252 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398133</link>
      <description>The Advance Ruling Authority did not provide a ruling on whether GST is payable under Reverse Charge Mechanism for the salary paid to Directors as per their employment contract. The applicant withdrew the application before a decision was made, and the Authority accepted the withdrawal request, concluding the proceedings without issuing any findings or analysis on the GST liability issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>