<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 239 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398120</link>
    <description>The ITAT Hyderabad remitted appeals for Assessment Years 2014-15 and 2015-16 back to the AO for fresh consideration. The AO was directed to verify the genuineness and creditworthiness of creditors and share applicants, including assessing the issue of addition related to the opening balance and set off of losses under section 115BBE in accordance with the law and CBDT Circular No.11 of 2009. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the necessity for a new assessment based on verified evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2020 21:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 239 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398120</link>
      <description>The ITAT Hyderabad remitted appeals for Assessment Years 2014-15 and 2015-16 back to the AO for fresh consideration. The AO was directed to verify the genuineness and creditworthiness of creditors and share applicants, including assessing the issue of addition related to the opening balance and set off of losses under section 115BBE in accordance with the law and CBDT Circular No.11 of 2009. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the necessity for a new assessment based on verified evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>