<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 236 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398117</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the land sold by the assessee did not qualify as agricultural land exempt from capital gains tax. Despite being classified as agricultural in revenue records, the lack of evidence of agricultural activities and the high sale price indicated it was not used for agricultural purposes. The appeal was dismissed, and the gain from the sale was subject to capital gains tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 236 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398117</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the land sold by the assessee did not qualify as agricultural land exempt from capital gains tax. Despite being classified as agricultural in revenue records, the lack of evidence of agricultural activities and the high sale price indicated it was not used for agricultural purposes. The appeal was dismissed, and the gain from the sale was subject to capital gains tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>