<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 68 Challenge: Creditworthiness Previously Accepted for Flagship Company, Lower Authorities&#039; Findings Deemed Unfounded.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54655</link>
    <description>Addition u/s 68 - allegation that assessee failed to prove the credit worthiness - since the credit worthiness of this company has been accepted in the case of flagship company of the appellant, we do not find any merit in this finding of the lower authorities. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2020 10:10:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2020 10:10:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 68 Challenge: Creditworthiness Previously Accepted for Flagship Company, Lower Authorities&#039; Findings Deemed Unfounded.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54655</link>
      <description>Addition u/s 68 - allegation that assessee failed to prove the credit worthiness - since the credit worthiness of this company has been accepted in the case of flagship company of the appellant, we do not find any merit in this finding of the lower authorities. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2020 10:10:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=54655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>