<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 229 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398110</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing the AO to allow Rs. 75,000 for the boundary wall construction, permit the deduction under Section 54F for the property purchased in the wife&#039;s name, allow Rs. 51,900 for registry expenses, and reconsider the claim for renovation expenses after reviewing the evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2020 10:10:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 229 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398110</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by directing the AO to allow Rs. 75,000 for the boundary wall construction, permit the deduction under Section 54F for the property purchased in the wife&#039;s name, allow Rs. 51,900 for registry expenses, and reconsider the claim for renovation expenses after reviewing the evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>