<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 219 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398100</link>
    <description>The Court disposed of the review applications, along with related writ petitions and appeals, by remanding the issue to the assessing authority. The parties agreed to deposit 20% of the tax due within four months, leading to the setting aside of assessment orders and demands for reassessment. The Court allowed installment payments and clarified that the deposit was subject to reassessment outcomes and further departmental decisions. The matter was resolved without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2020 10:09:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 219 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398100</link>
      <description>The Court disposed of the review applications, along with related writ petitions and appeals, by remanding the issue to the assessing authority. The parties agreed to deposit 20% of the tax due within four months, leading to the setting aside of assessment orders and demands for reassessment. The Court allowed installment payments and clarified that the deposit was subject to reassessment outcomes and further departmental decisions. The matter was resolved without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>