https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398097 The Court declined to quash the FIR and consequential proceedings, holding that grievances affecting the fairness and proper conduct of investigation could be examined by the Magistrate within the scope of supervisory powers under Section 156(3) CrPC. It noted that the Magistrate may direct further investigation at the pre-cognizance stage and that such supervisory authority continues until the trial begins. As the issues involved factual examination better suited to that forum, the petitioner was left at liberty to approach the Magistrate for appropriate relief. The criminal proceedings therefore remained undisturbed, with the remedy preserved before the competent Magistrate. en-us Thu, 03 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Sep 2020 10:09:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398097 The Court declined to quash the FIR and consequential proceedings, holding that grievances affecting the fairness and proper conduct of investigation could be examined by the Magistrate within the scope of supervisory powers under Section 156(3) CrPC. It noted that the Magistrate may direct further investigation at the pre-cognizance stage and that such supervisory authority continues until the trial begins. As the issues involved factual examination better suited to that forum, the petitioner was left at liberty to approach the Magistrate for appropriate relief. The criminal proceedings therefore remained undisturbed, with the remedy preserved before the competent Magistrate. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=398097