<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (11) TMI 392 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290056</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of providing preferential consideration to the poor and disadvantaged sections of society in bail matters. It clarified that the Chief Justice holds administrative jurisdiction over listing special leave petitions promptly. The Court highlighted its role in correcting miscarriages of justice, advocating for a National Court of Appeal. It reiterated its commitment to public interest litigation for marginalized groups and articulated norms for entertaining special leave petitions, emphasizing limited interference in routine bail matters. The writ petition was disposed of, recognizing the petitioner&#039;s advocacy for the underprivileged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2020 09:51:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=621585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (11) TMI 392 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290056</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of providing preferential consideration to the poor and disadvantaged sections of society in bail matters. It clarified that the Chief Justice holds administrative jurisdiction over listing special leave petitions promptly. The Court highlighted its role in correcting miscarriages of justice, advocating for a National Court of Appeal. It reiterated its commitment to public interest litigation for marginalized groups and articulated norms for entertaining special leave petitions, emphasizing limited interference in routine bail matters. The writ petition was disposed of, recognizing the petitioner&#039;s advocacy for the underprivileged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=290056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>