<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (7) TMI 84 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23159</link>
    <description>Judicial review of reassessment notices is limited to checking whether the assessing officer formed a bona fide belief on relevant material that income had escaped assessment because of failure to fully and truly disclose material facts. The court does not re-examine the sufficiency or adequacy of the material at the reopening stage. Stock-in-trade is a material fact for assessment, and merely producing books of account does not satisfy the disclosure duty if the actual stock position is not truly revealed. On the survey material and bank stock statements, the notices were supported by relevant material and were valid at initiation, so no interference under article 226 was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:35:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=62158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (7) TMI 84 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23159</link>
      <description>Judicial review of reassessment notices is limited to checking whether the assessing officer formed a bona fide belief on relevant material that income had escaped assessment because of failure to fully and truly disclose material facts. The court does not re-examine the sufficiency or adequacy of the material at the reopening stage. Stock-in-trade is a material fact for assessment, and merely producing books of account does not satisfy the disclosure duty if the actual stock position is not truly revealed. On the survey material and bank stock statements, the notices were supported by relevant material and were valid at initiation, so no interference under article 226 was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=23159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>